Nov 2 2010 Election Vote to remove Judge Gleason as Head Judge

Dear Alaskan’s on Nov 2nd 2010 Election, we must "Vote" to remove Judge Sharon Gleason as Head Judge and as a Judge from Anchorage Courtroom 603. For the following reasons, Judge Sharon Gleason's inability or refusal to apply and enforce the statutes and "Corrupt". Please read my story and others at www.childrenjustice.weebly.com which will surprise everyone of her actions.

The past 3 1/2 years, my 4 year old daughter’s life and mine has been a roller-coaster which I’m compel to share my story with everyone. At the end of the day, it’s my daughter’s safety and well being that I’m concern. In conjunction, with The “Corruption” that has occur in Custody Case # 3AN-06-12354CI between Attorney Marissa K. Flannery, Judge Sharon L. Gleason and Office Of Children Services (O.C.S) Casey Groat. Alaskan’s, this is 1 fight I cannot win alone against the “Good Old Boy Network”. Especially, against other State Agencies such as; The Ombudsman State of Alaska (Gwen Byington), The Alaska Bar Association (Donald W. McClinton, Steve Van Goor and Louise R. Driscoll), The Judicial Conduct of Alaska (Mrs. Greenstein) and The Assistant of Attorney General’s Office (Carla M. Raymond). They have failed to do their Jobs. This was confirmed by Our Late Senator of Alaska Ted Steven. And It’s why I’m pleading for either the FBI, The Media or a Grand Jury with Subpoena Power to intervene on my behalf. I will provide the evidence to support my allegations such as; names, dates, signatures, letters and each individual’s roll. But most of all, If this can happen to me it can happen to anyone. It’s why this coming Nov 2nd, 2010 Election, we must removed Judge Sharon Gleason as Head Judge and as a Judge by "Voting" No for Judge Gleason.

A) On Feb 14, 2008 in Custody Case # 3AN-06-12354CI, Judge Sharon L. Gleason allowed Attorney Marissa K. Flannery to commit “Perjury” on her “Affidavit” and eluded numerous of depositions. So, Marissa can represent her sister Chandra L. Flannery. Yet on 06/28/2007, 8 months prior to representing her sister Chandra, Marissa gave testimony to (O.C.S) Kelley Serafine about her sister’s DUI with Child in vehicle, nursed Child intoxicated, urinated on Child while passed-out, passed-out on top of Child and 10 year criminal history in Arizona. Furthermore, Marissa was granted 3rd party custodian of my daughter by Mrs. Serafine. On July 9, 2008 Trial, this is what Attorney Marissa Flannery was supposed to testify which is stated on Mrs. Serafine (O.C.S Case ID: 918040) Investigation Summary dated 06/28/2007. Furthermore, Mrs. Serafine found Chanrda “Substantially Neglectful” for jeopardizing the safety of the Child. Yet, on July 1st, 2009, Judge Gleason prevented Mrs. Serafine testimony against Attorney Marissa K. Flannery “Affidavit”.

Hmmm, This should makes us wonder Judge Gleason actions ?

1) On July 9, 2008, Jan 16, 2009 and July 1, 2009 Trial, Judge Gleason lied on the record and withheld evidence such as; O.C.S documents for “In Camera Review”. Casey Groat letters “Report To The Court” dated 12/5/2007. And an "Email" dated July 2nd, 2008 from Casey Groat to Attorney Marissa K. Flannery will contradicts Judge Gleason statement. It is why Judge Sharon Gleason "Moot" both my Subpoena's. I will provide the evidence to support my allegations such as; names, dates, signatures, letters and each individual’s roll.

2) On July 9, 2008 and Jan 16, 2009, Judge Gleason stated on the record that “O.C.S never gave documents for In Camera review and that the AG’s Office never granted nor signed the documents for In Camera Review”. Yet again, Casey Groat (O.C.S) “Report To The Court” dated 12/5/2007 states otherwise. And an "Email" dated July 2nd, 2008 from Casey Groat to Attorney Marissa K. Flannery will also contradicts Judge Gleason statement. In addition, on July 2nd, 2008, Judge Jill Stone and Assistant Attorney General Carla M. Raymond both signed the documents for “In Camera Review”. On July 7, 2008, Judge Gleason also signed the Order Granting Unopposed Motion for In Camera Review and Order Granting Unopposed Motion To Intervene For Limited Purpose. For these reasons above, on July 9, 2008 and July 1, 2009 Trial, Casey Groat of O.C.S failed to appear and produce. And is why Judge Gleason “Moot” both my Subpoena’s against Casey Groat. What is more amazing, on April 14 and 17 of 2009 Casey (Case ID: 918040) found Chandra L. Flannery “Substantially Neglectful” for jeopardizing the safety of the Child. And again, Casey Groat refused to testify on July 9, 2008 and July 1, 2009,

What is wrong with this picture ?



B) On July 21st, 2008, I wrote a statement requesting answers so The Ombudsman will intervene on my behalf against Casey Groats and for her action such as;

1) Casey Groat on April 14 and 17 of 09 (Case ID: 918040) found Chandra L Flannery “Substantially Neglectful” for jeopardizing the safety of the Child. Yet, Casey Groat refused to appear and produce on July 9th, 08 and July 1st, 09 despite being Subpoenaed .

from anyone stand point, Does this make any sense from a social worker ?

2) After July 9th, 08 Trial, Casey Groat decided to closed the case on July 12, 2009. Despite Chandra's history of alcohol abuse around the Child, Does the this make any sense ? Yet, both Pamela Shepherd on 9/26/2006 and Kelley Serafine on 6/26/2007 also found Chandra “Substantially Neglectful” for jeopardizing the safety of my Child.

3) What is more puzzling, on May 15, 2008 Casey Groat granted Thomas Hull (Chandra’s current husband) as a 3rd party Custodian of my daughter. Despite Mr. Hull’s Alcohol abuse and other criminal activities which is stated on Alaska Court View.

Does this make any sense on behalf of a Social Worker such as Casey Groat and The reply from Gwen Byington of the Ombudsman Office ?



C) On March 18, 2008, I filed a Grievance against Marissa K. Flannery Case # ABA File No. 2008D059 with the Alaska Bar Association for committing “Perjury” on her “Affidavit”. I got several response by Donald W. McClintock from the Board Discipline Liaison, Steve Van Goor and Louise R. Driscoll Assistance Bar Counsel which stated that an investigation is not warranted. Yet, during a conversation between Kelley Serafine and I. I asked if she had an interview with the Alaska Bar Association. Mrs. Serafine replied, “that not once has Mr. McClintock, Mr. Van Goor nor Mrs. Driscoll ever communicated with her either by email, telegram, phone call and/or visitation”. How can these 3 individuals conclude an investigation that is not warranted without Mrs. Serafine testimony ? In addition, How can these 3 individuals ignore Kelley Serafine O.C.S (Case ID: 918040) Investigation Summary dated 6/28/2007 and Ethical Rules and Regulations 3.7 ? Yet, 8 months prior to representing her sister Chandra, Attorney Marissa K. Flannery provided testimony and evidence about Chandra’s alcohol abuse around the Child such as; DUI with Child in vehicle, nursed Child intoxicated, urinated on Child while passed-out, passed-out on top of Child and 10 year criminal history in Arizona. Furthermore, Marissa was granted 3rd party custodian of my daughter by (O.C.S) Kelley Serafine.

Does these 3 individuals decision seems premature ? Especially, after Judge Gleason action an preventing Kelley Serafine testimony on July 1st, 2009 trial. Hmmm, makes me wonder about these 3 individuals actions ?



D) On Sept 10, 2010, I went to the Alaska Commission on Judicial Conduct and Filed a complaint against Judge Sharon Gleason in Custody Case # 3AN-06-12354CI for the following reasons;

1) Judge Gleason ignored Alaska Statue 25-24-150 on July 9th, 2008, July 1, 2009 and August 13, 2009. Despite Chandra's 4 violation condition of release between 2006 and 2008, Officer Simmons testimony on August 13, 2009 that found Chandra passed-out intoxicated at 5th Avenue Mall while Child ran around unattended, Pamela Shepherd on 9/26/2006 and Kelley Serafine on 6/26/2007, Casey Groat on April 14 and 17 of 2008 and Mrs. Collinsworth in 2009 found Chandra “Substantially Neglectful” (O.C.S. Case ID: 918040) for jeopardizing the safety of my Child.

What is wrong with this Judge ? Their Judge Gleason is "In Competent" or Judge Gleason is "Corrupt" ? Alaskan Citizens will decide.

2) On Feb 14, 2008, Judge Gleason allowed Attorney Marissa K. Flannery commit “Perjury” on her “Affidavit”. Yet, 8 months prior to representing her sister Chandra, Marissa gave testimony to Kelley Serafine and is noted on Mrs. Kelley Serafine O.C.S (Case ID: 918040) Investigation Summary dated 6/28/2007.

The Alaska Bar Association and the Judicial Conduct has ignored this evidence ?

3) On July 1, 2009, Judge Gleason prevented Kelley Serafine testimony against Attorney Marissa’s Flannery “Affidavit”. Despite Judge Gleason statement on Jan 16, 2009 hearing.

Does this make you wonder if their is "Corruption" ?

4) On July 9th 2008 trial, Judge Gleason withheld evidence for “In Camera Review” which can be confirmed by Casey Groat “Report To The Court” dated 12/5/2007. And an "Email" dated July 2nd, 2008 from Casey Groat to Attorney Marissa K. Flannery which also contradicts Judge Gleason statement.

Yet again, The Alaska Bar Association & the Judicial Conduct have refused to investigate Judge Gleason actions, why ?

5) On July 9, 2008 and July 1, 2009, Judge Gleason “Moot” both my Subpoenas against Casey Groat. This was confirmed by Michael Brown Supervisor of The Civil Division on Sept 10, 2010.

Can we get an answer why or is this a “Cover-Up” ?

Despite all the facts above, Mrs. Greenstein from the Judicial Conduct is refusing to investigate the above evidence. Nevertheless, I concluded that the only way to get the "truth" and nothing but the "truth", Is their through FBI, a Grand Jury with Subpoena Power, or by Media that have audacity, courage and nothing to loose like Late Senator Ted Steven. Someone that is willing to conduct a thorough investigation and have Kelley Serafine testify Under Oath... unlike The Alaska Bar Association Mr. McClintock, Mr. Van Goor nor Mrs. Driscoll and The Judicial Conduct of Alaska Mrs. Greenstein.



E) On Sept 25, 2010, I received a letter from Carla M. Raymond Assistant Attorney General stating that Judge Gleason got never the documents for “In Camera Review” before July 9, 2008 trial. It was on July 21, 2008, when Judge Gleason received the documents for "In Camera Review". I find this statement to be ridiculous. But most of all, insulting as I’ll refresh Mrs. Raymonds memory with name, dates and signatures.

Either yo Mrs. Raymond is “Covering-Up” for Judge Gleason actions or Mrs. Raymond you are just “In Competent”, as I’ll explain why ?

1) Prior to July 9th, 2008 Trial, Mrs. Raymond Assistant Attorney General and Judge Jill Stone "Granted" all the document for “In Camera Review” on July 2nd, 2008. Now, Mrs. Raymond is stating that these document sat on your desk for 19 days ? If so, Mrs. Raymond needs to answer serious questions about "withholding evidence or neglected evidence". Yet 7 days prior to July 9th, 2009 Trial, Mrs. Raymond and Judge Jill Stone "Granted" the documents for "In Camera Review". So, what happen to these documents for "In Camera Review" Mrs. Raymond ?

The Citizen's of Alaska, must now wonder how many other cases you withheld and/or neglected to provide evidence which directly and indirectly affect the Children of Alaska and the out-come of a Custody a Case such as mine ?

2) Nevertheless on 12/5/2007, Casey Groat (O.C.S) submitted a report which was requested by Judge Gleason “Report To The Court”. In addition, an "Email" dated July 2nd, 2008 from Casey Groat to Attorney Marissa K. Flannery that also contradicts Mrs. Raymond statement and Judge Gleason statement. It is why my Subpoena against Casey Groat was "Moot" to keep Casey Groat from talking.

So, Who is lying in this 3 ring circus ? The only way to find out the "Truth" is their through the FBI, A Commission with Subpoena Powers, The Media or an Outsider. To many contradictions ...

3) Mrs. Raymond lets go a step further, July 9, 2008 and July 1, 2009 my Subpoena against Casey Groat was “Moot” by Judge Gleason. Yet, This this individual Casey Groat found Chandra L. Flannery "Substantially Neglectful" on April 14 and 17 of 2008. And is able to contradict Judge Gleason's statement.

Nevertheless, Can you Mr. Raymond please give me a legitimate explanation why the Subpoena was "Moot" ? You and everyone else should wonder about Judge Gleason motive. I smell “Corruption”, what about you Mrs. Raymond ? I guess the citizens of Alaska will decide...


It’s remarkable the Level of "Corruption" that took place in Custody Case # 3AN-06-12354CI between Attorney Marissa K. Flannery, Judge Sharon Gleason and Casey Groat of O.C.S. In addition, Mrs. Raymond from The Assistant of Attorney General’s Office , Mrs. Greenstein from The Judicial Conduct of Alaska and Donald W. McClintock, Steve Van Goor and Louise R. Driscoll from The Alaska Bar Association. You guys have continued to ignore that facts. And to the individual that told my current Attorney to keep me quiet. You just ignited fuel to the fire. The Citizen's of Alaska and everyone in the Lower 48 “48 States” that are tired of the Politics, Lies and “Corruption”. It’s time for the individuals to be removed from their positions or start answering serious question ? Mrs. Serafine is ready to testify about her Investigation Summary Report dated 6/28/07 and against Attorney Marissa K. Flannery "Affidavit". Yet, these individuals continue to fail in their Jobs an putting Mrs. Serafine “Under Oath”. Nevertheless, This question might be puzzling for them but this question must be answered. Can someone save my daughter ?

Sharing Widget, Sharing Button, Sharing Plugin - ShareThis

Sharing Widget, Sharing Button, Sharing Plugin - ShareThis;

Alaskan's, A Shrine for Uncle Teddy...

A Leader that had will, spirit & determination to fight against his Foes. And Yes, at this with his new & old friends. But most of all, stood up to "Corruption" & all sorts of scandals from all direction with dignity. Their aren't not enough words to describe The Mans Character, Swagger & Charisma. But to say thank you... Especially his undivided attention which you listened without hesitation. As a simple man without any Political connections, I'll never forget those 45 minutes with Uncle Teddy. Despite his Political Peers & their advice, Uncle Teddy confirmed & substantiated "Corruption" that took place in Judge Sharon Gleason Courtroom 306 Case# 3AN-06-12354CI, Attorney Marissa K. Flannery (Grievance Case ABA File # 2008D059) & Casey Groat of OCS (Case ID: 918040) with the overwhelming evidence I provided. To this day, there aren't enough Politicians with audacity like Uncle Teddy did for me & my 4 year old daughter. To this day, I'm fighting for her safety & will-being. Where is Parnell, Murkowski. Palin or better yet you Felzenberg to report and conduct an investigation ? All 3 combine will never be half the Politician like Late Uncle Teddy. Rest his Soul, O Great 1. :-)))

Sincerely.


Lazaro Ecenarro

Hi everyone,

As a parent/father, my patience have been exhausted battling with a sick individuals Chandra Flannery mother of our daughter Sydney. Day in and day out being pushed around as given me now choice but to push back. For the past 3 days, I've tried communicating with my daughter which for one reason or another Chandra has not picked-up her cell phone. From day one, Chandra has violated the time frame Judge Gleason implemented in her chamber (7:30 am and 8:30 pm Alaska Time) sense January 0f 2009 when I decided to relocate because I had enough with the corruption. This time frame,  I should be able to communicate with our daughter yet it case not been the case. Chandra has been trying to push my buttons in order to get a reaction. So, Chandra can look good in up coming trial May 1st, 2009 in front of Gleason. Chandra has enjoyed playing this mental games between my daughter and me. At times, Chandra prevent me from communicating with Sydney, has forcing our daughter to hang-up on me and has made her cry. It is why Chandra, her attorney and Judge Gleason has prevented Alaska Care in  from allowing Sydney see a professional counselor even thou I requested in previous trials. They do not want the truth to come-out. Yet, The court have found Chandra a fit mother unlike OCS (office of Children Services) has found her substantially neglectful in 3 different occasions. Someone, Does this make sence ? I'm baffled the way her sister Federal Attorney Marissa Flannery has manipulated the judical system and has gotten away with their actions so far as lying on a Affidavit. If a normal citizen would have lied on an Affidavit or on the bench what would happen to them? Is their a double standard?  The truth most come out once and for all for the sake of Sydney. As a concern parent enough is enough can some please put an end to this... I'm ready to face the consequences with Judge Gleason May 1st, 2009 our next trial, so someone can help? 

The Alaskans citizens and the nation need to be warae the scale of corruption in our court system which I have every documentation to prove it. I strongly believe you'll find this matter unbelievable and tormenting about a normal middle class parent/father is fighting corruption and the safety of a child as I will list the individuals below;

1) Chandra Flannery mother of child

a. OCS found substantially neglectful 2006, 2007, and 2008

b. urinated on top of child, passed out on top of child and driven with child intoxicated

c. Arrested for domestic violence 

d. Arrested for DUI

e. Arrested for violating probation several times.

f.  Sister of federal attorney Marissa Flannery has connections in the legal system.

2) Ex- Attorney General Talis
a. Overrule subpoena prevents Casey Groat OCS from testifing against Chandra Flannery
b. Kelley Sarafine OCS testified against mother Chandra Flannery found substantially neglectful previous trail.
c. Friends with Federal Attorney Marissa Flannery

3) Federal Attorney Marrisa Flannery  (represent sister Chandra Flannery)
a. Lied on Affidavit to the court and The Bar association Knowledge/testimony about sister alcohol addiction
b. Friend with Ex-Attorney General Talis
c. spoke to Kelley Sarafine OCS about sister alcohol addiction.
d. Under subpoena as a witness a month before trial started yet became the Attorney for her sister.
e. Subpoena/testimony was waived by Judge Sharon Gleason and The Bar Association.

4) The Bar Association
a. After Trail Bar Association has not pursue an investigation as promised in there letter, why not?

b. Provided evidence about Marissa Flannery knowledge of sister alcohol addiction 

c. Marissa Flannery spoke to Kelley Sarafine OCS about sister alcohol addiction

d. Marissa Flannery lying on Affidavit.  

5) Judge Shanon Gleason
a. allowed Federal Attorney Marissa Flannery to represent sister Chandra Flannery dispite subpoena.
b. Never allowed Chandra Flannerys' arrest records nor OCS documents during trial.
c. Judge Jill Stone contradicts Gleason statement

d. Ignored Alaska Statue 24-25-150

        e. Ignored Judge Mark Rindner settlement agreement; I was persuaded/convinced by Rindner. 

6) Casey Groat OCS (office of children services)
a. Contradicts Gleason statement about documents vital for court hearing in letter.
b. Also found Chandra Flannery substantially neglectful in letter.
c. communication between Marissa Flannery and Casey Groat yet under subpoena.
d. influence by Marissa Flannery request Ex-Attorney General Talis from testifing overruling subpoena
e. replaces Kelley Sarafine, Why ?

7) Duke Circle ( new probation officer of Chandra Flannery)
a. replace old probation officer, Why?
b. past probation officer was not allowed to testify, why not?

8) Office of Children Services found Chandra Flannery substantially neglectful
a. Casey Groat        in 2008
b. Kelley Sarafine   in 2007
c. Pamela S.            in 2006
c. Domestic violence around child
d. failed urine test conducted my OCS (Casey Groat)

9) Sara Palin will not give me the time nor day, Why not?
a. friends with Ex-Attorney General Talis
b. I have called, written and gone to her office several times NO response.
c. Congressman French Hollis request her to review documents which where ignored.

10) Uncle Ted Steven after reviewing all documents tried to help with the FBI
a. despite FBI wanting to get involve they are unable to because its not federal
b. recommend French Hollis and cannot help out of jurisdiction despite wanting to help.
c. Don Young unable to intervene in this matter because its not federal.

d. ONLY ONE that can help is Sara Palin which she has refused because of cover-up.

All most every individual listed above has lied throughout the trial (named 1 thru 9 on outline). I have done everything in my power to prove it and protect my daughter yet every door as been closed for one reason or another. Does Sydney has to get hurt before anyone helps ?