As a parent/father, my patience have been exhausted battling with a sick individuals Chandra Flannery mother of our daughter Sydney. Day in and day out being pushed around as given me now choice but to push back. For the past 3 days, I've tried communicating with my daughter which for one reason or another Chandra has not picked-up her cell phone. From day one, Chandra has violated the time frame Judge Gleason implemented in her chamber (7:30 am and 8:30 pm Alaska Time) sense January 0f 2009 when I decided to relocate because I had enough with the corruption. This time frame, I should be able to communicate with our daughter yet it case not been the case. Chandra has been trying to push my buttons in order to get a reaction. So, Chandra can look good in up coming trial May 1st, 2009 in front of Gleason. Chandra has enjoyed playing this mental games between my daughter and me. At times, Chandra prevent me from communicating with Sydney, has forcing our daughter to hang-up on me and has made her cry. It is why Chandra, her attorney and Judge Gleason has prevented Alaska Care in from allowing Sydney see a professional counselor even thou I requested in previous trials. They do not want the truth to come-out. Yet, The court have found Chandra a fit mother unlike OCS (office of Children Services) has found her substantially neglectful in 3 different occasions. Someone, Does this make sence ? I'm baffled the way her sister Federal Attorney Marissa Flannery has manipulated the judical system and has gotten away with their actions so far as lying on a Affidavit. If a normal citizen would have lied on an Affidavit or on the bench what would happen to them? Is their a double standard? The truth most come out once and for all for the sake of Sydney. As a concern parent enough is enough can some please put an end to this... I'm ready to face the consequences with Judge Gleason May 1st, 2009 our next trial, so someone can help?
The Alaskans citizens and the nation need to be warae the scale of corruption in our court system which I have every documentation to prove it. I strongly believe you'll find this matter unbelievable and tormenting about a normal middle class parent/father is fighting corruption and the safety of a child as I will list the individuals below;
1) Chandra Flannery mother of child
a. OCS found substantially neglectful 2006, 2007, and 2008
b. urinated on top of child, passed out on top of child and driven with child intoxicated
c. Arrested for domestic violence
d. Arrested for DUI
e. Arrested for violating probation several times.
f. Sister of federal attorney Marissa Flannery has connections in the legal system.
2) Ex- Attorney General Talis
a. Overrule subpoena prevents Casey Groat OCS from testifing against Chandra Flannery
b. Kelley Sarafine OCS testified against mother Chandra Flannery found substantially neglectful previous trail.
c. Friends with Federal Attorney Marissa Flannery
3) Federal Attorney Marrisa Flannery (represent sister Chandra Flannery)
a. Lied on Affidavit to the court and The Bar association Knowledge/testimony about sister alcohol addiction
b. Friend with Ex-Attorney General Talis
c. spoke to Kelley Sarafine OCS about sister alcohol addiction.
d. Under subpoena as a witness a month before trial started yet became the Attorney for her sister.
e. Subpoena/testimony was waived by Judge Sharon Gleason and The Bar Association.
4) The Bar Association
a. After Trail Bar Association has not pursue an investigation as promised in there letter, why not?
a. Overrule subpoena prevents Casey Groat OCS from testifing against Chandra Flannery
b. Kelley Sarafine OCS testified against mother Chandra Flannery found substantially neglectful previous trail.
c. Friends with Federal Attorney Marissa Flannery
3) Federal Attorney Marrisa Flannery (represent sister Chandra Flannery)
a. Lied on Affidavit to the court and The Bar association Knowledge/testimony about sister alcohol addiction
b. Friend with Ex-Attorney General Talis
c. spoke to Kelley Sarafine OCS about sister alcohol addiction.
d. Under subpoena as a witness a month before trial started yet became the Attorney for her sister.
e. Subpoena/testimony was waived by Judge Sharon Gleason and The Bar Association.
4) The Bar Association
a. After Trail Bar Association has not pursue an investigation as promised in there letter, why not?
b. Provided evidence about Marissa Flannery knowledge of sister alcohol addiction
c. Marissa Flannery spoke to Kelley Sarafine OCS about sister alcohol addiction
d. Marissa Flannery lying on Affidavit.
5) Judge Shanon Gleason
a. allowed Federal Attorney Marissa Flannery to represent sister Chandra Flannery dispite subpoena.
b. Never allowed Chandra Flannerys' arrest records nor OCS documents during trial.
c. Judge Jill Stone contradicts Gleason statement
6) Casey Groat OCS (office of children services)
a. Contradicts Gleason statement about documents vital for court hearing in letter.
b. Also found Chandra Flannery substantially neglectful in letter.
c. communication between Marissa Flannery and Casey Groat yet under subpoena.
d. influence by Marissa Flannery request Ex-Attorney General Talis from testifing overruling subpoena
e. replaces Kelley Sarafine, Why ?
7) Duke Circle ( new probation officer of Chandra Flannery)
a. replace old probation officer, Why?
b. past probation officer was not allowed to testify, why not?
8) Office of Children Services found Chandra Flannery substantially neglectful
a. Casey Groat in 2008
b. Kelley Sarafine in 2007
c. Pamela S. in 2006
c. Domestic violence around child
d. failed urine test conducted my OCS (Casey Groat)
9) Sara Palin will not give me the time nor day, Why not?
a. friends with Ex-Attorney General Talis
b. I have called, written and gone to her office several times NO response.
c. Congressman French Hollis request her to review documents which where ignored.
10) Uncle Ted Steven after reviewing all documents tried to help with the FBI
a. despite FBI wanting to get involve they are unable to because its not federal
b. recommend French Hollis and cannot help out of jurisdiction despite wanting to help.
c. Don Young unable to intervene in this matter because its not federal.
5) Judge Shanon Gleason
a. allowed Federal Attorney Marissa Flannery to represent sister Chandra Flannery dispite subpoena.
b. Never allowed Chandra Flannerys' arrest records nor OCS documents during trial.
c. Judge Jill Stone contradicts Gleason statement
d. Ignored Alaska Statue 24-25-150
e. Ignored Judge Mark Rindner settlement agreement; I was persuaded/convinced by Rindner.
6) Casey Groat OCS (office of children services)
a. Contradicts Gleason statement about documents vital for court hearing in letter.
b. Also found Chandra Flannery substantially neglectful in letter.
c. communication between Marissa Flannery and Casey Groat yet under subpoena.
d. influence by Marissa Flannery request Ex-Attorney General Talis from testifing overruling subpoena
e. replaces Kelley Sarafine, Why ?
7) Duke Circle ( new probation officer of Chandra Flannery)
a. replace old probation officer, Why?
b. past probation officer was not allowed to testify, why not?
8) Office of Children Services found Chandra Flannery substantially neglectful
a. Casey Groat in 2008
b. Kelley Sarafine in 2007
c. Pamela S. in 2006
c. Domestic violence around child
d. failed urine test conducted my OCS (Casey Groat)
9) Sara Palin will not give me the time nor day, Why not?
a. friends with Ex-Attorney General Talis
b. I have called, written and gone to her office several times NO response.
c. Congressman French Hollis request her to review documents which where ignored.
10) Uncle Ted Steven after reviewing all documents tried to help with the FBI
a. despite FBI wanting to get involve they are unable to because its not federal
b. recommend French Hollis and cannot help out of jurisdiction despite wanting to help.
c. Don Young unable to intervene in this matter because its not federal.
d. ONLY ONE that can help is Sara Palin which she has refused because of cover-up.
All most every individual listed above has lied throughout the trial (named 1 thru 9 on outline). I have done everything in my power to prove it and protect my daughter yet every door as been closed for one reason or another. Does Sydney has to get hurt before anyone helps ?
All most every individual listed above has lied throughout the trial (named 1 thru 9 on outline). I have done everything in my power to prove it and protect my daughter yet every door as been closed for one reason or another. Does Sydney has to get hurt before anyone helps ?